Court rules U.S. border agents need warrants to search electronic devices

Evening Shot of Border Wall Between El Paso Texas USA and Juárez Chihuahua Texas at Puerto Anapra with US Border Patrol Vehicle in the Distance

Do U.S. border agents have free rein to search travelers' electronic devices, such as phones, tables, and laptops, without a warrant? According to court filings, that's what they were doing. But there might be an end to that "broad, unconstitutional authority," as the American Civil Liberties Union has called it.

A federal district court in New York sided with civil liberties groups to rule that U.S. border agents must obtain a warrant before searching those devices.

"As the court recognizes, warrantless searches of electronic devices at the border are an unjustified intrusion into travelers’ private expressions, personal associations, and journalistic endeavors — activities the First and Fourth Amendments were designed to protect," Scott Wilkens, senior counsel at the Knight First Amendment Institute, said in a press release. "The ruling makes clear that border agents need a warrant before they can access what the Supreme Court has called a 'window onto a person’s life.'"

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

The ruling comes as part of a case in which a U.S. citizen, Kurbonali Sultanov, was flagged at New York's JFK International Airport for being "a possible purchaser or possessor of child sexual abuse material." Authorities allegedly found four videos on his phone after border agents said he had to give them his phone's password — without a warrant. He argued that the search violated his Fourth Amendment rights.

Mashable Games Mashable Games

The court found that "the searches of Sultanov’s phone violated the Fourth Amendment, which requires cell phone searches at the border to be supported by a warrant and probable cause; however, the Court denies suppression of the evidence because the government acted based on "the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule."

Christianna Silva Senior Culture Reporter

Christianna Silva is a Senior Culture Reporter at Mashable. They write about tech and digital culture, with a focus on Facebook and Instagram. Before joining Mashable, they worked as an editor at NPR and MTV News, a reporter at Teen Vogue and VICE News, and as a stablehand at a mini-horse farm. You can follow them on Twitter @christianna_j.

Recommended For You Bing, DuckDuckGo, and other search engines can no longer crawl Reddit.

Reddit and Google logos

Reddit and Google logos

It's a partisan issue.

Senate Minority Leader Sen. Charles Schumer, D-NY, and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi smile during a press conference following the vote that would help stop the Federal Communications Commission's effort to reverse Obama-era regulations on <a href=net neutrality May 16, 2018." width="220" height="133" />

Senate Minority Leader Sen. Charles Schumer, D-NY, and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi smile during a press conference following the vote that would help stop the Federal Communications Commission's effort to reverse Obama-era regulations on <a href=net neutrality May 16, 2018." width="220" height="220" />

The billionaire has blown a lot of hot air about a big tech CEO cage match in the past.

An illustration of two Rock 'Em Sock 'Em robots facing each other with Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk's heads superimposed onto their bodies.

An illustration of two Rock 'Em Sock 'Em robots facing each other with Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk's heads superimposed onto their bodies.

The feud continues.

A smartphone shows the X logo. In the background the Brazilian flag is visible.

A smartphone shows the X logo. In the background the Brazilian flag is visible.

From the Echo Dot to the Echo Show, these Amazon Alexa-ready devices will have you doling out voice commands like a pro.